What an ego boost. I posted the results once before on my myspace blog, but this explanation is slightly varied.
This one is offered by Keirsey.com:
The Portait of the Champion (ENFP)
The Champion Idealists are abstract in thought and speech, cooperative in accomplishing their aims, and informative and expressive when relating with others. For Champions, nothing occurs which does not have some deep ethical significance, and this, coupled with their uncanny sense of the motivations of others, gives them a talent for seeing life as an exciting drama, pregnant with possibilities for both good and evil. This type is found in only about 3 percent of the general population, but they have great influence because of their extraordinary impact on others. Champions are inclined to go everywhere and look into everything that has to do with the advance of good and the retreat of evil in the world. They can’t bear to miss out on what is going on around them; they must experience, first hand, all the significant social events that affect our lives. And then they are eager to relate the stories they’ve uncovered, hoping to disclose the “truth” of people and issues, and to advocate causes. This strong drive to unveil current events can make them tireless in conversing with others, like fountains that bubble and splash, spilling over their own words to get it all out.
Champions consider intense emotional experiences as being vital to a full life, although they can never quite shake the feeling that a part of themselves is split off, uninvolved in the experience. Thus, while they strive for emotional congruency, they often see themselves in some danger of losing touch with their real feelings, which Champions possess in a wide range and variety. In the same vein, Champions strive toward a kind of spontaneous personal authenticity, and this intention always to “be themselves” is usually communicated nonverbally to others, who find it quite attractive. All too often, however, Champions fall short in their efforts to be authentic, and they tend to heap coals of fire on themselves, berating themselves for the slightest self-conscious role-playing.
Joan Baez, Phil Donahue, Paul Robeson, Bill Moyer, Elizibeth Cady Stanton, Joeseph Campbell, Edith Wharton, Sargent Shriver, Charles Dickens, and Upton Sinclair are examples of Idealist Champions
IDEALIST NFs, being ABSTRACT in communicating and COOPERATIVE in implementing goals, can become highly skilled in DIPLOMATIC INTEGRATION. Thus their most practiced and developed intelligent operations are usually teaching and counseling (NFJ mentoring), or conferring and tutoring (NFP advocating). And they would if they could be sages in one of these forms of social development. The Idealist temperament have an instinct for interpersonal integration, learn ethics with ever increasing zeal, sometimes become diplomatic leaders, and often speak interpretively and metaphorically of the abstract world of their imagination.
They are proud of themselves in the degree they are empathic in action, respect themselves in the degree they are benevolent, and feel confident of themselves in the degree they are authentic. Idealist types search for their unique identity, hunger for deep and meaningful relationships, wish for a little romance each day, trust their intuitive feelings implicitly, aspire for profundity. This is the “Identity Seeking Personality” — credulous about the future, mystical about the past, and their preferred time and place are the future and the pathway. Educationally they go for the humanities, avocationally for ethics, and vocationally for personnel work.
Social relationships: In their family interactions they strive for mutuality, provide spiritual intimacy for the mates, opportunity for fantasy for their children, and for themselves continuous self-renewal. Idealists do not abound, being as few as 8% and nor more than 10% of the population.
Do you guys need any more proof that I am going to be the next Gandhi?
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has.” –Margaret Mead.
To be Ghandi would be a regression in self-worth.
I wish I had read this before. I’m and ENFJ.
Ghandi, like myself, was an INFJ, as was Jesus.
Jesus? That’s bullshit. Did he descend from heaven just to take Jung’s test?
SHUT UPPP
Silly goil! I knew 3/4’s of YOUR type before you took the quiz. We know enough about the Heyzeus to type him. People will argue his is another type, but most would agree he was INFJ.
I’ve always been an INFP. I have a good friend in maryland who’s an ENFP also. she can makes friends with anyone. it’s kinda funny. she’s always pink and fluffy when she’s not in the hospital with something diabetes related.
mhm
I’ve been in HR for years and talks of using Personality Tests alone for hiring scares me. We use the Myers-Briggs Personality Testing for screening of canidates. However, we will not use the test unless their potential direct report manager has screened them first. I cannot believe that some companies will actually use any personality profile for initial screening. You will miss a great deal of good canidates by looking at their profiled personality.
But, using it as a screening tool after you have lined up good canidates is a good idea – at least to me. Recently I had two canidates who looked very similar – Both has roughly the same education, work experience and credentials. One of them had a better looking personality profile – it was more in line with what we were looking for. So we went with them.
I think use of these tools makes sense in this context.
Anyone have a thought?